FATF Warns Gambling’s Digital Ecosystem Is Creating New Money Laundering Risks

The money-laundering risk around gambling no longer stops at the casino cage or the betting operator.

Read more NFL

A new assessment from the Financial Action Task Force pushes much further into the infrastructure that now sits behind gambling: e-wallets, mobile payment services, virtual assets, social-media platforms, digital marketplaces and other services connecting players and operators to the financial system.

That wider focus is one of the more consequential elements of FATF’s new work on gaming and gambling. Published on September 9, the report introduces risk indicators intended to help regulators, governments and private companies identify money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation-financing activity. Malta’s Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit circulated the findings to regulated entities on September 14.

The report arrives after a year-long FATF project drawing on information from more than 80 jurisdictions as well as industry organizations and researchers. It is also FATF’s first detailed examination of the risks attached specifically to online and illegal gambling.

The Risk Is Moving Beyond Gambling Operators

What emerges is an industry whose financial-crime exposure has become harder to contain within the traditional boundaries of gambling regulation.

Online gambling can operate across borders and move funds through several payment methods with little connection to the physical infrastructure regulators historically supervised. A customer may interact with a gambling platform, fund an account through an e-wallet or virtual asset and encounter the service through a social network or digital marketplace.

Some companies involved in that chain may not be subject to the same regulatory regime as the gambling operator itself.

That fragmentation matters.

FATF identified payment channels including cash, e-wallets, mobile money and virtual assets as vulnerable to laundering. It also pointed to social-media companies, software developers and digital marketplaces among the services on which gambling and gaming businesses increasingly depend.

Some sit beyond established gambling oversight, leaving potential gaps that can be exploited by criminal networks.

FATF Sets Out New Red Flags

The organization has now given authorities and companies a more concrete set of warning signs to look for.

Among them are customers operating multiple accounts or using different payment methods under different identities, mismatches between payment information and customer records, questionable identity documents and unusual combinations of betting and financial transactions.

Complex corporate structures that make the true owners of gambling businesses difficult to identify are another indicator.

FATF also identified gambling activity that appears to function primarily as a mechanism for moving funds rather than wagering them. Breaking transactions into numerous smaller amounts to avoid detection is another pattern regulators are being told to watch.

So are unusually large or coordinated bets involving events already associated with possible competition manipulation.

Illegal Gambling Creates a Bigger Enforcement Problem

The problem is not confined to licensed operators.

Illegal gambling emerged from FATF’s work as one of the sector’s largest vulnerabilities. In some jurisdictions, the organization found that the illegal market can rival or exceed the regulated one.

Offshore businesses may present themselves to customers as legitimate gambling companies while offering anonymity or other features attractive to criminal users.

Read more Football

Regulatory borders can work in their favor. Gambling rules, financial controls and enforcement powers vary considerably between countries, creating opportunities for operators and criminal networks to shift activity between jurisdictions.

Those differences can also obstruct information sharing and make cross-border investigations more difficult.

Ownership Structures Can Hide Who Is Behind an Operator

Ownership provides another potential route around scrutiny.

FATF found that shareholdings can be arranged in ways that keep individual stakes below thresholds that would otherwise trigger regulatory checks.

The vulnerability becomes greater in jurisdictions where beneficial-ownership controls, anti-money-laundering supervision or anti-corruption systems are weak.

The findings broaden an AML problem that regulators have traditionally associated with casinos. Organized crime attempts to own, influence or exploit gambling businesses are not new. Digital gambling, though, adds layers of companies, payment methods and jurisdictions between an operator, its customers and the movement of money.

Crypto and Digital Payments Complicate the Trail

FATF connected abuse of gambling and gaming systems with cyber-enabled fraud, corruption, professional money-laundering networks and organized crime.

The same infrastructure that allows legitimate gambling businesses to reach customers internationally can also give illicit funds multiple routes into and through the formal financial system.

Virtual assets are particularly significant within that broader picture, but they are only one part of it. E-wallets and mobile-money services can also sit between gambling accounts and conventional banking channels, making the payment ecosystem itself an important part of AML monitoring.

For regulators, that means following money across services that may operate under different licensing, reporting and customer-verification requirements.

The Regulatory Blind Spot Sits Around the Platform

The practical impact of the report will now depend partly on how national authorities interpret those connections.

FATF sets international standards rather than directly regulating gambling companies, but its work feeds into national AML regimes and assessments of whether jurisdictions are effectively controlling financial-crime risks.

That makes the report relevant beyond compliance departments at casinos and online sportsbooks.

The more difficult regulatory problem sits in the surrounding network. A gambling operator may be licensed and supervised while another service involved in acquiring customers, moving their money or facilitating digital transactions falls under a different regulator — or outside gambling regulation altogether.

FATF’s latest indicators effectively tell authorities to follow that network rather than treating the gambling operator as the end of the investigation.

In an industry increasingly built on cross-border platforms and fast-moving digital payments, the financial trail may lead well beyond the bet itself.

Read more Playnetic goes live with Svenska Spel Sport & Casino, in Sweden through Light & Wonder

Source: fiaumalta.org